War in Iraq?

General talk. News, religion, politics, your daily life, whatever, it goes here. Just keep it clean.
Mog Dragonheart
Red Dragon Priest
Posts: 140
jedwabna poszewka na poduszkę 70x80
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2003 7:52 am

War in Iraq?

Post by Mog Dragonheart »

What's the deal man? I'm shipping out for the Marines in June and I been thinking for the first time about this so called "Rebuilding Process" in Iraq. Is this a war of hidden religious agenda? Are "the West" systematically decade by decade trying to obliterate 'Islam' or something?

User avatar
phyco126
Dragonmaster
Posts: 8136
Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2002 3:06 am
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA

Post by phyco126 »

I suppose that makes sense, we all know insurgents don't attack the moscs (forgive the spelling) rather we just make the public think they do, when in fact we do!

/sarcasm off

I fail to see any hidden religious agenda. Sure, there may be plenty of hidden agendas some where, but I've yet to see any proof of a religious kind.
Image

- "Sometimes life smiles when it kicks you down. The trick is to smile back."

User avatar
Dragonmaster Dyne
Red Dragon Priest
Posts: 144
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 2:26 pm
Location: Home is where you make it..
Contact:

Post by Dragonmaster Dyne »

This has nothing to do with religous agendas.

User avatar
GhaleonOne
Ghost From The Past
Posts: 9082
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2002 4:59 am
Location: Not of this world...

Post by GhaleonOne »

FYI to anyone who posts in this thread. Keep it civil or I'll lock it. This topic could easily spiral into a flamewar, and I'd like it to stay in the bounds of quality discussion than petty arguments.
-G1

User avatar
Kizyr
Keeper of Knowledge (probationary)
Posts: 8329
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2002 7:36 am
Location: Marius Zone
Contact:

Post by Kizyr »

GhaleonOne wrote:FYI to anyone who posts in this thread. Keep it civil or I'll lock it. This topic could easily spiral into a flamewar, and I'd like it to stay in the bounds of quality discussion than petty arguments.
Congrats G1, you have the 32,768th post! I've been waiting for someone to reach 32,768 since we first hit 16,384!

Anyway...
I'm shipping out for the Marines in June and I been thinking for the first time about this so called "Rebuilding Process" in Iraq. Is this a war of hidden religious agenda? Are "the West" systematically decade by decade trying to obliterate 'Islam' or something?
No, even I don't believe that... KF
~Kizyr (they|them)
Image

Mog Dragonheart
Red Dragon Priest
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2003 7:52 am

Post by Mog Dragonheart »

phyco126 wrote:I suppose that makes sense, we all know insurgents don't attack the moscs (forgive the spelling) rather we just make the public think they do, when in fact we do!

/sarcasm off

I fail to see any hidden religious agenda. Sure, there may be plenty of hidden agendas some where, but I've yet to see any proof of a religious kind.
I'm saying naturally no Government wants to see another Islamic Superpower like the Ottomans or the Persians to ever happen again. I don't mean they want to wipe clean the Islams off face of the Earth.

User avatar
GhaleonOne
Ghost From The Past
Posts: 9082
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2002 4:59 am
Location: Not of this world...

Post by GhaleonOne »

Congrats G1, you have the 32,768th post! I've been waiting for someone to reach 32,768 since we first hit 16,384!
Um... okay? Any particular reason? I'm sure there's some reason behind it, but I can't think of... wait, okay. I knew that number looked familiar. It's the max value of an integer. Did you think the board would blow up or something? :P
Persians
The height of the Persian Empire was way before Islam though. Even before Christianity.
-G1

User avatar
exigence
Blue Dragon Ninja
Posts: 571
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 10:32 pm
Location: ohio

Post by exigence »

GhaleonOne wrote:
Congrats G1, you have the 32,768th post! I've been waiting for someone to reach 32,768 since we first hit 16,384!
Um... okay? Any particular reason? I'm sure there's some reason behind it, but I can't think of... wait, okay. I knew that number looked familiar. It's the max value of an integer. Did you think the board would blow up or something? :P
can you explain the whole integer thing to me i think i was sleeping that day in math and thats where i got confused with the lemina bug
Image

User avatar
Kizyr
Keeper of Knowledge (probationary)
Posts: 8329
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2002 7:36 am
Location: Marius Zone
Contact:

Post by Kizyr »

GhaleonOne wrote:
Congrats G1, you have the 32,768th post! I've been waiting for someone to reach 32,768 since we first hit 16,384!
Um... okay? Any particular reason? I'm sure there's some reason behind it, but I can't think of... wait, okay. I knew that number looked familiar. It's the max value of an integer. Did you think the board would blow up or something? :P
Oh no, that would be silly!

The boards will blow up once we hit 65,536.

I've been using binary a lot lately; 32,768 is a major milestone because it's 2 to the 15th power--or, written in binary, that would be 1,000,000,000,000,000. The maximum value for a double-byte character (16 bits) is 65,535, which is why the boards will blow once we hit 65,536.

See, it all makes sense. It's the same reason why you couldn't get more than 255 rupees in the original Legend of Zelda: one more and your money-pouch would explode. KF
~Kizyr (they|them)
Image

User avatar
Grey Fox
Red Dragon Priest
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 3:26 am
Location: The Fletcher Memorial Home

Post by Grey Fox »

No, if we wanted Islam gone, we'd have to do much more than simply take out the middle east. Islam has spread very wide, we'd have a very widespread target to hit. Plus, with enough radical Islamic followers, a strike to the religion would cause even more damage than we can afford. I don't think we're that stupid.
No ma'am...no your computer isn't broken, you are...

User avatar
Sonic#
Pao Tribe Chieftain
Posts: 4692
Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2002 3:27 am
Location: Here, there, everywhere
Contact:

Post by Sonic# »

Mog Dragonheart wrote:
phyco126 wrote:I suppose that makes sense, we all know insurgents don't attack the moscs (forgive the spelling) rather we just make the public think they do, when in fact we do!

/sarcasm off

I fail to see any hidden religious agenda. Sure, there may be plenty of hidden agendas some where, but I've yet to see any proof of a religious kind.
I'm saying naturally no Government wants to see another Islamic Superpower like the Ottomans or the Persians to ever happen again. I don't mean they want to wipe clean the Islams off face of the Earth.
... but Iraq was nowhere near the power of the Ottomans in the first place. If we invaded in order to stop something like that, I don't think we even chose the right target. Not that there is a right target.

And what does this have to do with the rebuilding process? Perhaps I'm misunderstanding.
Sonic#

"Than seyde Merlion, "Whethir lyke ye bettir the swerde othir the scawberde?" "I lyke bettir the swerde," seyde Arthure. "Ye ar the more unwyse, for the scawberde ys worth ten of the swerde; for whyles ye have the scawberde uppon you, ye shall lose no blood, be ye never so sore wounded. Therefore kepe well the scawberde allweyes with you." --- Le Morte Darthur, Sir Thomas Malory

"Just as you touch the energy of every life form you meet, so, too, will will their energy strengthen you. Fail to live up to your potential, and you will never win. " --- The Old Man at the End of Time

JWL
Red Dragon Priest
Posts: 132
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 5:01 am

Re: War in Iraq?

Post by JWL »

Mog Dragonheart wrote:What's the deal man? I'm shipping out for the Marines in June and I been thinking for the first time about this so called "Rebuilding Process" in Iraq. Is this a war of hidden religious agenda? Are "the West" systematically decade by decade trying to obliterate 'Islam' or something?
Considering that "the West" is breaking its back trying to get the Iraqi Sunnis and Shia to cooperate and set up a democratic government with minority rights, no, I would have to say that their goal is not to obliterate Islam.

I would rather not see any more empires which go around killing everyone who is different, regardless of the name of the religion/ideology it's done in. This has little to do with what religion people are and more to do with the interpretation of that religion and/or its abuse for ill purposes.

Consider Christianity for example. The roots of the religion are love, charity, mercy, and brotherhood. Yet historically there have been Christians who seem to have had the exact opposite philosophy. That some Christians have lost their way does not mean that Christianity itself should be obliterated.

User avatar
AbsoluteAlex
Red Dragon Priest
Posts: 130
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 4:37 pm
Location: NH

Post by AbsoluteAlex »

From firsthand, this insurgency is routed in intolerance, revenge, selfishness, greed, all wrapped in the shroud of religion to gain support. Religion is a powerful motivator.
I wasn't born to fit in, I was born to stand out

User avatar
Angelalex242
Legendary Hero
Posts: 1315
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 8:38 pm
Location: Lucia's Fortress

Post by Angelalex242 »

More men are slain in the name of Gods that are peaceful and full of love then of those who were gods of war.

Think about that for a while...
Don't blame me, Lucia promised me lots of snuggles and cuddles if I would be her PR guy.

Image

User avatar
Kizyr
Keeper of Knowledge (probationary)
Posts: 8329
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2002 7:36 am
Location: Marius Zone
Contact:

Post by Kizyr »

Angelalex242 wrote:More men are slain in the name of Gods that are peaceful and full of love then of those who were gods of war.
Think about that for a while...
I thought about it...

And that statement makes no sense.

Think about it: while there were gods of war, we're talking polytheistic societies--specifically, ancient Greek, Roman, Viking, Mesopotamian, etc. In other words, wars prior to c400AD. Wars in the ancient era were done for military conquest, imperial expansion, etc.; praying to the gods was just a part of that.

The only thing that statement does is say that wars currently are more bloody than wars in the ancient era.

Which is obvious. We have more people, better weapons, and direct hand-to-hand combat isn't a major part of warfare.

Hence, why that statement is meaningless.

By the way, if you want to get into the whole "well more people were killed in religion's name than -blah blah blah-" then have something to back it up. KF
~Kizyr (they|them)
Image

JWL
Red Dragon Priest
Posts: 132
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 5:01 am

Post by JWL »

Angelalex242 wrote:More men are slain in the name of Gods that are peaceful and full of love then of those who were gods of war.
Think about that for a while...
Actually most people slain in the name of God are slain in violation of God's laws for the sake of personal gain. It is not religion which causes death. Rather the causes of death are selfishness, greed and apathy - all things which religion usually stands up against.

Think about that for a while.

User avatar
Jenner
Dragonmaster
Posts: 2307
Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2002 1:24 am
Location: Happily ever after
Contact:

Post by Jenner »

... It's sad to hear that the stuff my associate told me is true.
That the military is telling soldiers and recruits that the "towlhead" "sand n***ers" are unchristian heathens.

:/ My displeasure grows,
Way to spread hate and intolerance.
The Infamous Jenner!
Maker of Lists.
RIP Coley...
Image
still adore you Kiz.

User avatar
GhaleonOne
Ghost From The Past
Posts: 9082
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2002 4:59 am
Location: Not of this world...

Post by GhaleonOne »

While I have no doubt there probably are a few people like that (issues like the case where some soldiers killed a family and raped the little girl in the night - which is sickening), I'd be willing to wager that it's nowhere near as widespread as some people make it out to be. I've known probably 10 people who have been sent to Iraq in the past 2 years or so and none of them fit that image at all. All of them were far more interested in just trying to do their part in fixing the situation, rather than causing more problems.
-G1

User avatar
AbsoluteAlex
Red Dragon Priest
Posts: 130
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 4:37 pm
Location: NH

Post by AbsoluteAlex »

The military does not think like that as a whole and it sure as hell doesnt teach its soldiers that. In fact soldiers, marines, airmen, and sailors on the ground must go through a cultural education training prior to setting foot outside a base in iraq. They are trained to speak very basic arabic, learn what cultural rights and wrongs are. (Sunglasses as an example are offensive to wear when talking with someone). I very much doubt and i can vouch that the military does not advocate calling iraqis heathens. Many soldiers, marines, etc see stressful things and as a result may have biased views of people. If your associate told you those things, then that may have been the opinion of his fire team leader, squad leader, or maybe another soldier in his platoon, but to think that it would get to a level above that is not likely. If an officer, or higher NCO advocated that kind of behavior he would be reassigned or punished by the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Opinions by soldiers are one thing, but the military does not teach that, trust me.
I wasn't born to fit in, I was born to stand out

User avatar
Megalodon
Student of Vane
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 1:03 am
Location: Tucson, AZ

Post by Megalodon »

Kizyr wrote:
Angelalex242 wrote:More men are slain in the name of Gods that are peaceful and full of love then of those who were gods of war.
Think about that for a while...
I thought about it...

And that statement makes no sense.

Think about it: while there were gods of war, we're talking polytheistic societies--specifically, ancient Greek, Roman, Viking, Mesopotamian, etc. In other words, wars prior to c400AD. Wars in the ancient era were done for military conquest, imperial expansion, etc.; praying to the gods was just a part of that.

The only thing that statement does is say that wars currently are more bloody than wars in the ancient era.

Which is obvious. We have more people, better weapons, and direct hand-to-hand combat isn't a major part of warfare.

Hence, why that statement is meaningless.

By the way, if you want to get into the whole "well more people were killed in religion's name than -blah blah blah-" then have something to back it up. KF
I agree the statement did in fact not make sense. I don't think it has ever really been JUST a religious thing but more of a destruction or forced conversion based on the cultural beliefs as a whole. Religion more or less is just used as a justification. Religions' an easy tool to use for manipulation. Everybody in one way or another can identify.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests